I visited all the search tools in the first list and chose to explore "Gigablast" since it's boasting a 90% greenness. You have to try and be environmentally conscious these days right? Anyway, it's a very clean and simple layout which I like. It's not full of ad banners like some of the others. I tried the [mullet] search and didn't get one hit on the first page referring to fish. I then tried [mullet and fish -hair*] and really narrowed it down. This engine seems to work like Google or Yahoo in terms of boolean operators. I would have to say its advanced features are not quite what Google has but will do the job especially if you already know your boolean operators. I would use it again for research or casual use and I bookmarked it so I can.
Review 5 Features:
1. Supports Boolean Operators
2. Has an advanced search feature with drop-down boxes.
3. Customized Tool Bar with restricted searches to designated url's.
4. Did I mention it's Green?
5. Number five is extraneous because it's just that simple. I'm struggling for unique features at this point. Let's move on.
Meta:
From the second list I chose the "Ixquick" metasearch tool. It has a fancy streamlined look just like Gigablast. Some just have too many links and stuff all over the place! So this one produced some articles about fish on my first try with just [mullet]. That seems like a pretty good start. I tried [mullet -hair] and it produced similar results to Gigablast. You can also filter by category such as pictures or video. I don't see a major difference between the first two search tool lists.
Review 5 Features:
1. Supports Boolean Operators similar to above
2. Has an advanced search feature with drop-down boxes.
3. Filter by domain type
4. Filter your search by "host" or "hosts" of specific computers( this seems kind of unique)
5. Use boolean to search titles and links etc..
Subject Directory:
And the last list is the one I was most curious about. I chose "Infomine" because I liked the way it is categorized on the homepage. The overall look is a little shabby though. You won't get many hits for [mullet] here however(sad). Looks like the regular search engines are best for that kind of stuff. I really like the searching power of the subject directories. You have more versatility with boolean operators. For academic purposes this seems to be the best option once you know what your looking for. Very similar to Proquest or Ebsco in features. I'm not sure why I just wouldn't stick to our library resources. I suppose if I was researching something that was really specific and was having a hard time finding anything in our databases.
5 Features:
1. Supports Complex Boolean Operators
2. Has an advanced search feature with MANY drop-down box options
3. Filter your searches in many ways such as "access"(free or not) and "type"(journals, books etc..)
4. Limit your searches to a specific category such as "medical" or "arts"
5. Limit your search to specific fields such as "title"